Friday, June 26, 2009

Listen to the Aquifers

With elegant awe we view Piedmont and mountain land,
And its underground counterpart we try to understand.
The animated hidden ground water has much to say.
Looking closely, we see how the water game will play.

Beneath all of the slopes of every mountain valley,
And under more Piedmont slopes than we can tally,
Ground water moves at its preferred pace,
Never interested in some competitive race.

Under the soil and into rock’s winding fractures,
Always seeking springs and lowland apertures,
Trickling below elusively for tens to hundreds of weeks,
Ground water moves steadily toward nearby creeks.

The aquifers are bounded by hilltops and adjacent streams.
Further limited by deep unfractured rocks, each seems
Ready to cope with global warming and our water need,
But our greedy habits don’t abide by the aquifers’ creed.

In a trough between adjoining aquifers is each river or creek.
Aquifers nourish and pamper them and try not to let them leak.
Furnishing water to streams during long periods without rain
Is a big responsibility that aquifers try to maintain.

A true environmental pulse is each aquifer’s water table.
Down in dry weather and up in wet weather is a nice label.
As each aquifer is small, modest in yield, and not tightly connected
Over-pumping of ground water regionally is not to be expected.

As each aquifer may be sensitive to abuse by us,
It can spitefully fight back and raise a fuss.
When water is overused or contaminants are in its path,
An aquifer has several ways to boldly express its wrath.

Not easily adaptable to human regulations,
Aquifers behave with their own deliberations.
The aquifers are talking, but do we listen?
Are there valuable lessons we are missin’?

Our forefathers expected pristine ground water everywhere.
Now, the hidden sea of ground water is pocked here and there
With a plume of contaminated ground water from each waste site.
Spreading and mixing of good and bad water is now a sorry plight.

Local aquifers refuse to cooperate with urban sprawl.
Dense population creates waste, and aquifers have gall.
Some aquifers are poisoned each month and can never come back.
Sustainability of all good ground-water supplies is not on track.

As surface water supplies weaken in a drought
Well water from aquifers may continue to spout.
Groundwater storage may lessen but can still bring
Water supplies to be replenished by the coming spring.

In emergencies that may arise with unforeseen disaster
Places for special pure water we may need to get faster.
Here and there is a pristine spring in a v-shaped valley
For us to appreciate and around which we can rally

Hill and dale, linked mini-aquifers everywhere surround us.
Translations of landscape and geologic thoughts are a plus.
Topographic maps help us to view aquifers in a splendid way.
We now see how each aquifer’s underground game can play.

The underground landscape offers new scenic views,
And exploring with aquifers offers a creative cruise.
To look under ground with art in virtual reality,
One can see nature’s handiwork and its vitality.

The Water Table

Every landowner subconsciously has one
Talking about it is vague when said and done.
We may not see the water table
Yet, its importance is no fable
And to predict its character is a bit of fun.

Lying a short distance below the ground
Beneath the hills it is shaped as a mound
Infiltrating rainfall makes contact.
The water table can play and act,
Changing patterns with little or no sound.

The water table mirrors the slope of the land
Almost, and that statement is powerful and grand
The topographic map says we can see
The water table and what it can be
Good aquifer information is already at hand.

The water table is an environmental pulse to use
It’s a part of the water cycle on which to cruise
Always moving up or down
Here and there under ground
It is the pivotal item to make the news.

“Save our water table,” an erroneous expression,
Yet, on a bumper sticker as a good impression.
People want to know its behavior
Wishing for it to be a water savior
Will it be a topic in a global warming session?

Personality and Human Characteristics of Aquifers

Aquifers like to be treated with respect. If they are abused, they can be contrary, and the ground water can be spiteful. They would admit these charges if they were allowed to speak.

Most people don’t think seriously of the valuable ground water and the water-bearing formation which is in the ground beneath their feet. Aquifers have a range of personalities and characteristics. They can be kindly or unkindly. What is behind the hostility? Let’s have a conversation with ground water and the aquifers.

Humans argue about good and bad features of ground water and the behavior of aquifers. Points of view differ widely while total understanding and communications are less than perfect. The aquifers want to express themselves, but they are left out of the discussions and communications.

Aquifers are talking but do we listen?
Is there something we are missin’?

The personality and human characteristics of aquifers can be expressed usefully in metaphorical language. Ascribing human feelings and sensibilities to nonhuman beings, objects, or phenomena is known as anthropomorphism. This approach tends to provide a different perspective and represents a useful picture language. For example, the well beckons and invites the surrounding relaxed ground water to its pompous pump.

Aquifers try to serve humans in helpful ways, but these water-bearing systems can be undesirably stubborn, resulting in problems that collectively run into billions of dollars. Aquifers can readily resist some human actions. An attitude or light-hearted philosophy which maintains that inanimate objects are hostile to humans is called resistentialism. It involves seemingly spiteful behavior from these objects or phenomena. You drop the toast and it hits the floor jelly side down. Humans feed aquifers with wastes here and there, and in return the aquifers give contaminated water back in dispersed form that is difficult and costly to manage. In some cases, over-pumped aquifers give brackish or undesirable water of poor quality to well supplies. Ground water can bite back in many ways.

"As an aquifer, I abide by nature’s wishes and not by human wishes and expectations. Why do humans think that they are ordained spokespersons for me? Government agencies try to protect me, of course. Yet, I developed my characteristics and special patterns long before the regulatory agencies were formed. They try to make me behave in regimented ways that they have devised. I have my own creed and will continue to behave as nature has taught me, regardless of human demands. Humans should try to understand better how I operate and then apply proper rules-of-thumb procedures and generalizations that reasonably apply.

Like the human body, I have many parts, features, and characteristics that act together in hidden ways. The ground-water specialists probe and examine me with test wells and monitoring programs. In similar ways to blood-pressure tests, they may check my inner system and patterns of fluid flow. In some cases the costs are very high. I do not try to simplify things. I tease humans with various complexities and drive mathematical-oriented specialists wild, but they pretend to make me simple and play with me in idealized ways. I am never perfect in all respects. I have as many flaws and complex side-effects as many human medicines.

Humans appreciate my great usefulness in providing potable water to wells for many people and my ability to furnish water to creeks and rivers to maintain surface water supplies. Yet, when abused I can fight back and be spiteful. As with the human body, I can get sick and weak. Already there is a wide variety of problems which will be even more critical in the years ahead. Humans should realize that I will be involved in important benevolent and malevolent consequences as a result of the future global climate change. We have had communication problems in the past, but I am willing to talk with you."



"I am not easily adaptable to human regulations
But I will behave with my own deliberations."

-The Aquifer Creed


(Published in Nov.-Dec. 2006 by The Professional Geologist
(TPG) vol 43, no. 6, p.23

Wellhead Protection

A well’s area of water contribution
Comes from an outward reach of distribution
When the well is pumped, it beckons,
For the water to come from all sections.

A pumped well causes a stir in the water table
The disturbed water reacts as it is capable
A pumping cone of depression is developed
And a local circle of water is enveloped.

We can see that a well needs space
To have ample, pure water in every case.
Regulators require a zone of wellhead protection
The site of the well must have careful selection.

Permeable rocks and a high-yielding well
May cause the cone of depression to outward swell.
Under opposite conditions, the cone may be steep
And the cone may not have a great outward leap.

On up-slope parts of the cone in the water table
The natural flow of ground water is able
To enter the cone and contribute
More water for a sustained supply to suit.

So, if the well were able to talk
It would inevitably balk
If the contributing area is much too small
Or if contaminants are in urban sprawl.

The Plume

A plume of contaminated ground water is conceived
At the water table without any welcomed need.
It may have an elongated trend,
Finding where and when to end.


Wherever serious and massive wastes may loom
The ground setting is right for a contaminant plume
Abundant in areas of human sprawl
Chances of potable water may fall.

An action that may lead to unintended consequence
Should be considered without words to mince
What could really go wrong?
It’s Murphy’s Law and so long.

Can we merely wait and do nothing but debate
While hoping that contaminants will attenuate
At a waste site we know
As the plume continues to grow?

No method of remedy or simple treatment is ideal
Everyone wishes that the aquifer would heal
The old method of “pump and treat”
Almost always ends up incomplete.

Aquifers Bite Back

An aquifer’s structure has its own natural special charge
In handling water recharge, transmission, and discharge.
When humans interfere in their way
Aquifers bristle and have much to say
There may be serious confrontations that are large.

Aquifer’s habits and behavior have been in play
Human modifications may not have much to say
Aquifers can bite back
Without losing much slack
Can humans compromise with very little to pay?

We will not always have our way
With aquifers in the game they play.
They continue to adhere to nature’s creed,
And we must be meek and adjust our need.
We should look to see what the aquifers say.

The Proud and Powerful Well Pump

Just a simple matter-of–fact it may easily sound
That a well pump draws water out of the ground
But humans thrive in many ways
Because the pump works and plays.

The aquifer gives up water readily
When the pump is in action steadily
The water table falls as a cone of depression
While the activity of the pump is in session.

Aquifers and pumps should be a bipartite
To see that humans get ground water just right
Enough water to supply the needy
And not too much to bring out the greedy.

The Piedmont and Mountain Aquifer Compartment

Ground-water conditions are easier to analyze
If we first outline a compartment as to size
A compartment is a distinctive topographic space
Among similar ones on the ground we can trace.

It is the aquifer system lying beneath a hilltop and creek
It may be further bounded by small lateral spurs that peak.
Compartments represent slopes and gentle topographic lows
Into which local insulated ground water gathers and flows.

Not naturally affected by adjoining compartments,
Each has its own distinctive but similar departments.
Thus, there are thousands of mini-aquifers in each county
Some similarities of each can represent a study bounty.

Knowledge of general factors of a compartment to a degree
Offers transfer knowledge to other compartments, we see
We should not collect data about a compartment uselessly
If our generalized model shows equivalent information readily.

The Wonderful Topographic Map

For Piedmont an Mountain ground-water insight
The local topographic map gets it right
The topographic contours conveyed on the ground
Reveal much about water behavior that is sound.

A subdued replica of the surface of the land
Is the water table below, going hand-in-hand.
The crude similarity is rather easy to see
Rendering many interpretations that should be.

Recharge, transmission, and discharge we surmise
And inferences from the map are no surprise.
Studying ground water in the region is prolonged
If we do not use topographic maps all along.

We can readily note ground-water seepage and springs
By using deduction that a topographic zone brings.
We should start our study with a thinking cap
And the appropriate topographic map in our lap.

Aquifer Protection

An aquifer is an unwelcome host to wastes that we generate
Protection of aquifers is a subject we highly often debate
A concise method of protection is obscure
We wish it were simple and pure.
We must first map the plumes and recognize their fate.

Some aquifers store water readily, but recharge can be slow
In this case heavy ground water use will let us know
That progressively lowering the water table
Will prevent sustainability to be able
To leave our descendants enough water to bestow.

Aquifer protection is a philosophy we try to follow
But in real practice our hopes tend to be hollow.
Impacts of population tend to increase
As other desires of humans don’t cease
And sacrifice to protect aquifers is hard to swallow.

Is Another Exodus on the Way?

Moses traveled far to find a well
He smote the rock in a distant dell
We treasure water as much today,
But we find water in a skillful way.

May we face another exodus from semi-arid states
If water does not come at reasonable rates?
Drought conditions may be quite severe
If effects of global warming should soon appear.

Limited aquifer recharge from rain or snow
May lead to subsequent scarcity of water and woe
If human use and water associated action
Don’t balance the recharge and discharge faction.

A water budget program in a semi-arid land
Needs management that is of a restricted brand
Irrigation from wells for crops has been a blessing
But declining ground-water levels breeds lessening.

Well water is desirable because of its useful location
And the aquifer is pleased to offer modest inspiration.
The proud pump beckons water from round about
And the aquifer is recharged after each drought.

Yin and Yang in Ground Water

Ground water almost everywhere faces yin and yang
Where opposing but complementary principles hang
Where good conditions exist there may be bad
And where bad conditions exist some good may be had.

Convenience but poor yields characterize wells on hills
Better yields in valleys face inconvenience still
Waste sites on hills may contaminate nearby wells
Yet creeks may be contaminated by wastes in dells.

Contrariness in ground water management is faced
Because both desirable and undesirable conditions are based
Win-win or perfect conditions are not expected
But useful ground-water results should be respected.

We are optimistic about long-range sustainability
Because the water table has seasonal rechargeability
Yin and yang are parts of ground-water evaluation
Striving for ground-water benefits is a proclamation.

Ground Water and Regulatory Agencies


The regulatory agencies try hard
To keep the public on guard
For aquifer problems that may arise
Yet, the rules sometime fail to be wise.

The rules are strict and presumably fair
Yet, some people tend to despair
When there are harsh demands to comply
With certain rules that should not apply.

Ground-water conditions are quite variable
Rendering some rules not easily playable
An aquifer absorbs wastes as a ready receptacle
But contamination spots are not easily detectable.

Costly, intensive groundwater tests are too often mandated
Whereas adequate and skillful studies may be best tolerated.
Excessive work is devoted to some sites selected
While most contaminated sites and problems go undetected.

Risk Assessment and Decision Making


We may not always be treated merrily
Because ground water may act contrarily
Too little or too much ground water at a place
Is a situation people commonly face.

Skillful decisions we must not lack
To keep risk assessment always on track
Ground water thoughts at every turn
Favorable and unfavorable issues to learn.

Precise forecasts are very seldom sound
Many uncertainties and hedge terms abound
To explain whether a waste site has a favorability
Or a place in the context of comparability.

Better knowledge with less money to churn
Water supply or contamination a concern
Ground water moves in mysterious ways
We learn how the ground-water system behaves.

Looking Underground at the Aquifer

A little knowledge is not really a dangerous thing
Looking under ground, greater knowledge can bring.
The aquifer that stretches out below our feet
Has much information to offer when we meet.

Though literally invisible, the aquifer has some ways
To show how its structure and behavior conveys
The main characteristics that help us to understand
The translations and inferences that go hand-in-hand.

The poem, “Listen To The Aquifer,” offers a position
From which more knowledge builds in tradition
A network of ideas that must be cautious in scope
So that our good reasoning better helps us to cope.

Seeing under ground is an exercise in virtual reality
The aquifer greets us with intellectual cordiality
The public can be on a fast-track learning mode
If not faced with a complex scientific code.

Coastal Plain Aquifers



Two types of Coastal Plain aquifers are in layers
The water-table and deep confined aquifers are players
Distinctly separated by beds of clay
Leakage of water between is in the play
Warding off aquifer problems are in our prayers.

Recharge to the water-table aquifer is at hand.
Precipitation goes directly into exposed sand.
Almost everywhere it is for domestic supply.
But caution exists where contaminants lie.
For humans this aquifer represents an active land.

The water-table aquifer is as busy as can be
Its recharge and discharge we can almost see.
Learning from water-table fluctuations,
We understand the aquifers’ deliberations.
Streams and confining beds fit nicely to a tee.

Confined aquifers at best have water of high pressure
With optimistic view we consider this a real treasure
But with recharge conditions so slow,
We could ultimately face limited flow
Long-term use of well water we must closely measure.

Scarcer now are the artesian, or overflowing, wells
Years ago were commonly displayed in many dells
Pumping wells cause cones of depression
As lower water levels express a recession
Understanding unwinds as the long story tells.

For thousands of years in a state of storage
The confined water has little chance of flowage
For practical purposes, the water is mined
And for future use, we are getting behind
For a long period we must carefully manage.

As confined water moves coastward and down dip
It is blocked by salty water as a wall-like strip
Upward through clays some water leaks
But not a true outlet that it really seeks
Long in residence, the water never has a big trip.

Development of Carolina Bays’ Oval Depressions

My interest in the Carolina Bays was generated in 1937.
As a geology student at the University of North Carolina,
I was a member of a team studying the Bays near Darlington, S. C.
After intermittent, persistent studies, I now put thoughts in poetic form.


The Carolina Bays are a geologic wonder.
Of their origin we can only ponder.
Beautiful landscape scars seen from the air
Elegant oval sags, they lie on land with a flair.

In parts of the Coastal Plain that are flat and low
Their abundance and southeast orientation show.
Geologic characteristics here are unusual on earth,
But questionable thoughts arise about their birth.

An early theory focused on a shower of meteorites
Postulated as having hit the earth in angular flights.
Another geologist visualized Neptune’s racetrack
With lakes and eddies for wind currents to pack.

Effort has been directed to artesian springs
In a complex hypothesis that also brings
Solution that produced basins occupied by lakes
With a beach and sand ridge that a current makes.

New ideas and questions arise each year,
And better knowledge of their origin is near.
The theory I expressed 50 years ago failed,
But the thoughts here might be nearly nailed.

Focus is on compaction and subsidence of clay beds.
The sequence of events holds tightly on strong threads.
Compound actions occurred that were elsewhere rare
To consider them carefully is only fair.

The impacts of Pleistocene sea level fluctuations
Need more emphasis and deliberations.
As the most recent seashore moved out more,
The bays began their life inland from the shore.

Sand and clay beds are inter-layered closely.
The beds increase and tilt southeastward mostly.
The fluid pressure in the aquifer system declined,
And compaction of clay beds was not far behind.
The compaction of a clay bed led to subsidence
Slightly at local haphazard spots, and hence
Another subsided clay bed above or below,
Combined subsidence in the ground would grow.

The shape of a bay would not be round at land surface
But would be oval because of tilted beds in place.
Upper or lower local subsidence would be in laps
Which cause coastward migration of collapse.

Elsewhere widespread pressures decline readily
When thick sand beds are pumped steadily.
The clay bed subsidence is even but not evident,
Contrasting here with multiple beds being prevalent.

Another reason the land has subsided sporadically
The fluid pressure had declined emphatically.
The briny aquifer water that before was dense,
Has pushed seaward by fresh and light water since.

Dampness and near-surface water table in the bays
Result in color and plant contrasts in several ways.
The darker bay soil and surrounding white sand
Have much to say about the Carolina Bay brand.

Here and there, overlapping of bays on the land
Depend on sporadic subsidence of the clay and sand.
Predicting actions at a specific time is only a game,
And specific spots for bays we cannot name.

Bays and humans have wrinkles somewhat akin.
Both with a period of dehydration under the skin
The underlying soft watery foundation is within.
Are bays’ wrinkles prettier than those of women?

Of the origin we have long waited for news.
In the poem there may be likely clues
For someone to intellectually pursue
The makings of Carolina Bays as they grew.

Bay development will not likely be repeated
For thousands of years until the sea has retreated.
We may leave the bays as features of mystery.
They are a part of nature’s elegant history.

Anxieties on Ground Water over the Cape Fear Arch



The Cape Fear Arch displays a collage of mystery
Put together by events in geologic history.
A hidden rock ridge beneath the Coastal Plain,
Important existing conditions occur in a chain.

The Arch is dormant and quite massive,
But above it things are dynamic and not passive.
The Arch causes a bad aquifer to rise and leak.
Brackish water and gas at the land surface can peek.


Preface

This essay contains important statements with scientific backing but without full cited references and without complete analyses of various factors. More conventional scientific studies and documents must come later. While approaching the age of 92 and after 60 years of intermittent study and thoughts about the complex hydrogeology in the region of the Cape Fear Arch, I do not have the energy and capability to pursue further studies. This essay should provide some guidance for further research. Illustrations are not available to facilitate better understanding of the essay.

A strange dome of ancient brackish ground water in sand and clay formations lies near land surface above the basement rocks in an area called the Cape Fear Arch. The main area of focus is in New Hanover and Brunswick Counties in North Carolina. The geologic features in this area have resulted in an unusual set of conditions, which collectively appear to be unique. In hydrologic terms, this area is a major discharge zone of high-pressured brackish ground water along a part of the Atlantic coast. Knowledge of this setting is essential to prevent possible troublesome reactions to human activities concerning ground water. Also, knowledge needs to be gained to determine if leakage of natural gases in the area contributes to global warming. For example, it can be said that understanding and managing this intrusive brackish and gas-prone aquifer and its adjacent potable water system should be an issue for true regional management.

A noteworthy combination of sequential geologic phenomena since Cretaceous time has occurred above the Cape Fear Arch in North Carolina. The linked conditions have elements of human importance that even include, in a lighthearted way, the senses of seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, and feeling. Moreover, certain myths, such as those of the Maco light and of the Guns of Seneca in southeastern North Carolina, likely have important scientific interpretations.

Having scientific and historical adherence, the total story stretches through geologic and human time. It is sketched here in a narrative, abbreviated way. Elements of the story will need to be studied in detail and to be fully integrated. Most conditions expressed can be well documented but are incompletely interpreted. Some explanations are suggested here and are open to critical questions. Nature has left us with a specific setting, showing that human interests can go hand-in-hand with picturesque geologic phenomena.

A part of the story about the Cape Fear Arch

Driving from Raleigh or from Myrtle Beach to Wilmington a traveler does not put eyes on the Cape Fear Arch, or the Great Carolina Ridge, as it was earlier called by geologists. Yet, the Arch rises vividly when visualizing the underground landscape. Puzzling discoveries are yet to be made about the Cape Fear Arch. The Cape Fear Arch is a basement rock structure beneath the general area of the lower Cape Fear River. The basement is at a shallower depth than at similar geologic coastal places in South Carolina and Georgia. Draping over the Arch are nearly flat sand and clay formations of Cretaceous age that are slightly tilted coastward. They extend, and are equivalent in age and character, to formations beneath the general area of the South Carolina coast, where they are more deeply buried beneath younger formations. Thus, the basal Cretaceous formations on the Arch are a shallow segment of the regional Coastal Plain sediments of the Atlantic Coastal Plain. All formations dip coastward and tend to thicken coastward far out to sea.

The occurrence and flow of water in this regional artesian system both now and in the geologic past are only partly known. All aquifer systems tend to have a recharge zone at a high elevation, which leads to a transmission zone and then to some type of lower discharge zone, which may be close or far away. We cannot trace each drop of water, but ground-water levels can be mapped so that the general behavior of ground-water flow is displayed.

With focus on the regional basal Coastal Plain beds, the general flow of water in the composite sand aquifer system tends to extend from a recharge area in central to south-central Georgia, where the pertinent formations lie about 300 feet above sea level. The natural early-stage flow in the confined system is southeastward and coastward to a position about 1800 feet beneath the Savannah and Charleston area where no natural deep discharge zone is available. This slow flow began long ago in Cretaceous time. The fresh water flow is blocked further southeastward by dense salty formation water already anciently stored in deeper and coastward parts of the aquifer system. Still trying to find a discharge zone, the fresh water in the aquifer turns northeastward beneath the general South Carolina coastal area. In this buried northeast travel it abrades against the seaward salty water of the confined aquifer with which it becomes brackishly mixed. It is still seeking a discharge area, although quite far away toward the Wilmington area.

North of Myrtle Beach the aquifer and its pressurized water has been pushed upward on the southern bedrock flank of the Cape Fear Arch. The aquifer becomes closer to land surface in an area northwest of Wilmington.

While making ground-water studies in southeastern North Carolina in 1954, I discovered a broad dome of brackish ground water occurring in a large area west of Wilmington. A search for its apex indicated that it reaches land surface as a seepage spring in a small creek between the Cape Fear and Black River a few miles above their confluence.

The unusual natural occurrence of brackish ground water inland at the land surface above the level of high tide has presumably not been reported elsewhere in the Atlantic Coastal Plain. A semblance of an ancient salt pit marked the locality where brackish water seeps from surface sands into a small stream. From the salt pit the natives evaporated the brackish water to get salt for human use during early days. Both the water and channel sand emit an odor of hydrogen sulfide, and white to gray slimy sulphur-smelling deposits occur along the bottom of the channel. Only bits of the puzzle were recognized then.

Many people are familiar with two mysterious phenomena that may be related to the story told here. One is the legend of the Maco Light and the other is the Guns of Seneca.

The Maco light. The legend, and part ghost story, of the Maco light dates back to 1867, when, as the ghost story tells, one evening a conductor on the last car of a train found that his car had been uncoupled and was about to be crashed by an on-coming train from the rear. He waved his lantern to alert the oncoming train, but the wreck decapitated him. It was reported that he continued to wave the lantern, until the lighted lantern rolled over and finally came to rest in an upright position. Shortly after the accident, the Maco light began to be noticed along the main track. It has been appearing there since and has become a popular curiosity for warm summer night visitors. It is reported that almost no one fails to see the light. Following the Charleston earthquake of 1886 the light stopped but returned sometime later. In 1889 the light was reported to have been seen by President Grover Cleveland. (This Maco light account was compiled by Troy Taylor, in Ghosts of the Prairie). Disregarding the ghost story related to the conductor and lantern, focus is on the likelihood of people seeing the light and possible implications. The light had to be observable before the ghost story of the lantern would be fabricated. Several theories have been proposed about the cause of this curious condition. The most reasonable explanation is that it comes from gas rising from a large marsh nearby. This explanation should get support from the fact that additional gases are rising into surface strata from deeper beds in this region. Does the light come from this combination of gases? Further study is needed

The Guns of Seneca. Mysterious booming noises off the coast of Brunswick and New Hanover Counties have been heard at various intervals by many people for more than a century. They have been called Guns of Seneca for being similar to the legendary booming noises on Seneca Lake in New York caused by Indians wanting to annoy immigrant Europeans with booming rifle blasts during early American times. They are also called sea farts by some local people. Some reports of shaking ground have been made, but they have not been scientifically related to specific earthquakes. I suggest that the booms may be the result of explosions of gases that have accumulated from aquifer leakage near the sea bottom five or more miles offshore. The gases are known to seep upward from the basal aquifer system on the Cape Fear Arch onshore. The gases leaking out of the offshore part of the aquifer would be trapped beneath the dense sea water until sufficient pressure would be disturbed at various times for the inversion to rectify and for an explosion to occur. Such explosions are known from trapped gases in some volcanic lakes under similar trapped conditions. Aquifer water less dense than sea water is also being trapped and might cause the explosion. There is probably a threshold position off shore before which and beyond which the pressure conditions would not be favorable for an explosion to occur. Not related directly to this situation but similar in principle is the theory that in the geologic past, massive explosions at certain times from accumulated gas hydrates on the sea floor have upturned and reached the atmosphere in sufficient volume to cause much life on earth to be exterminated. Gas hydrates are farther out in the Atlantic beneath deeper water. The sea farts in the region deserve scientific focus.

The basal aquifer system is more highly pressurized than might normally be expected. During my studies more than 50 years go, I realized that flowing wells over the Cape Fear Arch were more common than elsewhere on the Coastal Plain, which indicates substantial fluid pressure in the basal formations. Several decades ago an effort was made to dispose of some chemical wastes in the deep aquifer in an area several miles northwest of Wilmington. This plan failed because the pressure in the deeper aquifer was too great to accept the wastes satisfactorily. Also, mapped water levels in the basal aquifer showed the flow of water is not southeastward and down dip in the formation as is common elsewhere but up dip and northwestward. This strange and anomalous condition indicates a strong tendency for salty formation water to move inland from seaward positions on the flank and top of the Cape Fear Arch.

Where does this high fluid pressure come from? Some of the water has a tendency to come from a high intake recharge area in inland Georgia and South Carolina, before making a u-turn beneath the South Carolina coast, as indicated earlier. Also, a likely probability is that a relic and preserved pressure system has been maintained for many thousands of years when sea level and aquifer water levels were higher. Moreover, there has been an overall and sporadic inland movement of sea level and aquifer salt water zone from low positions a few tens of miles off shore from the present stand during Pleistocene and Holocene times. This long term encroachment of the sea on land has serious consequences. The rising of sea level would result in briny aquifer water offshore pushing the landward, aquifer water back inland under high pressure. The seaward high pressure would be maintained and increased inland because movement is toward the narrow part of the wedged aquifer system. Thus, this continual rising of sea level is a serious impediment in maintaining fresh water supplies in this coastal area. The indirect effects of rising sea level may not be fully evaluated by many hydrologists who study fresh and salt water relations in coastal areas for water supplies.

The discharge of water and gas has not been steady at certain places. The discharge zone would have moved outward and southeastward as the sea retreated and would have moved inland, on the Arch, as sea level moved inland. Some water is constantly leaking upward into overlying beds in its overall travel. The absence of the Maco light immediately after the 1886 Charleston earthquake suggests that leakage of gas and water to the Cape Fear Arch was temporarily lessened as minor faulting and upward leakage of water lessened the deep water pressure in the large aquifer area beneath the coastal area.

How extensive is the spread of the gases now? Although some escape of gas may appear concentrated in the vicinity of the salty water seepage spring and also along some spots in the Cape Fear River channels, the outward leakage is likely widely dispersed through creeks, marshes, and some Carolina Bays. Could the aggregate gas discharge tend to increase global warming? It is almost certain that gas and fresh and brackish water have seeped outward to varying degrees and sporadically through hundreds of thousands of years as sea level advanced and retreated. The significant aquifer discharge has been active for ages. Whether we call it the Cape Fear Arch or The Great Carolina Ridge, its presence causes a major aquifer system to be upturned so that confined water and gas can discharge in ways to leave many unsolved mysteries.

In a geologic sense, one can see underground. We can see the Cape Fear Arch, at least in a picturesque manner. The human senses come to mind in the Cape Fear region also. One can see the slimy sulfur deposits in a stream channel and also the light at Maco. One can perhaps hear the booms of the Guns of Seneca, smell the hydrogen sulfide odor, taste the brackish and sulfide water, and feel the ground shaking from booms of the Guns of Seneca. In an artful and facetious sense, where else on earth can all human senses be similarly recorded?

The sight of the Grand Canyon receives much publicity,
But we can see the Cape Fear Arch in “virtual” reality.
Both are spectacular in their own way,
Underground landscapes are pictures to display.

An undesirable evil aquifer has a wide spread.
Seemingly proud of its high pressure head,
Salty water and gas would like to burst out
And harm us somehow round about
.

We must learn how the aquifer will behave
So that parts of the environment we can save.
Here we may need to leave some of the aquifer alone
Or pursue actions only with the proper tone
.

Comment on references

A more scientific document would have called for more references. The purpose of this reference is to indicate the location of the cited salt-water and gas seepage spring.

LeGrand, H. E. 1955, Brackish water and its structural implication in the Great
Carolina Ridge, NC: Am Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull.,
v. 39, no.10, p. 2020-2027.